2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-online scheduling: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is also closely related to the online l p -norm loadbalancing problem on two hierarchical machines [6,29] and the online machine covering problems on two hierarchical machines [30][31][32]. Furthermore, more related results can be found in the recent surveys [33][34][35].…”
Section: The Contributions Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This problem is also closely related to the online l p -norm loadbalancing problem on two hierarchical machines [6,29] and the online machine covering problems on two hierarchical machines [30][31][32]. Furthermore, more related results can be found in the recent surveys [33][34][35].…”
Section: The Contributions Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In different jobs this known extra information can be the maximum job size, the order in which jobs arrive, or the total execution time. This additional information in Dwibedy and Mohanty (2022) refers to the fact that the total time of task execution is known. In this paper, this additional information means that the task length is known, and that the processing speed of only some of the computing nodes and the routing delay when the task is assigned to that node is known.…”
Section: Core Scheduling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offline task scheduling algorithm usually means that all parameters are known in advance by the system, and it is a static scheduling algorithm (Zorbas et al, 2019). The online task scheduling algorithm is more complicated, and all parameters and information cannot be known before the task is executed, and the processing time of the task needs to be obtained according to the actual operation situation (Even et al, 2009). However, the actual situation is often more complicated, and there are situations where neither online nor offline scheduling algorithms can play a role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this is different from the well-known online setting: There, an algorithm does not see the whole input instance but is presented with the jobs to be scheduled one at a time and has to make an immediate scheduling decision (Albers 2009). This limitation is also present in both the semi-online setting and in its generalization, scheduling with advice, where the algorithm has access to additional information on the input sequence or output properties (Dwibedy and Mohanty 2022;Boyar et al 2016). In contrast, our enumeration algorithms do have access to the complete input and are free to decide which jobs to schedule next.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would, however, expect inferior results, as online algorithms are usually unable to give optimal solutions to input instances (cp. Dwibedy and Mohanty 2022). In this work we mostly look into enumeration algorithms that solve instances exactly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%