2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-010-9440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Pappus configurations; combinatorial generalizations of the Pappus configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and afterwards considering their 'product' {a, i 1 } ⊕ {i 1 , i 2 } and {a, i 1 } ⊕ {a ′ , i 2 } we see that, conversely, (iii) implies if a line L of M has two points common with H, two in (X \ A) ⊠ I or one in (X \ A) ⊠ I and the second in ℘ 2 (I) then L ⊂ H, and each line of M of the form (15) crosses H. (19) Finally, we pass to the lines of M of the form (16). Let p = {a 1 , a 2 } ∈ ℘ 2 (X), and b ∈ X, i ∈ I, q = {i, b}.…”
Section: (I) Every Set H(j|w \ A) With J ⊂ I Is a Hyperplane Of M In ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…and afterwards considering their 'product' {a, i 1 } ⊕ {i 1 , i 2 } and {a, i 1 } ⊕ {a ′ , i 2 } we see that, conversely, (iii) implies if a line L of M has two points common with H, two in (X \ A) ⊠ I or one in (X \ A) ⊠ I and the second in ℘ 2 (I) then L ⊂ H, and each line of M of the form (15) crosses H. (19) Finally, we pass to the lines of M of the form (16). Let p = {a 1 , a 2 } ∈ ℘ 2 (X), and b ∈ X, i ∈ I, q = {i, b}.…”
Section: (I) Every Set H(j|w \ A) With J ⊂ I Is a Hyperplane Of M In ...mentioning
confidence: 94%