Semi-quantitative CT scoring of nailed shaft fractures during normal healing and in non-unions: comparison with radiographic scoring

Perlepe, Vasiliki; Michoux, Nicolas; Kirchgesner, Thomas; Lecouvet, Frédéric; Berg, Bruno

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109618

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, it does not compare the use of mRUST with other advanced imaging modalities, which may affect the results. For example, Perlepe et al 16 compared mRUST with a Tomographic Union Score in a heterogenous group of tibia and femur fractures, and they found mRUST only weakly correlated with the Tomographic Union Score in a cohort of patients with nonunion. In addition, as this study focuses solely on the radiographic findings postoperatively, it does not evaluate a clinical correlation between mRUST and patient outcome or progression to union.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of the Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) for Femoral Shaft Fractures

Foley

Simpson

Farooq

et al. 2023

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of the Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) for Femoral Shaft Fractures

Foley

Simpson

Farooq

et al. 2023

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Since certain injuries (such as stress fractures) don't turn up on an X-ray for a couple weeks after the bone begins to hurt, MRI is used as a tool of investigation. A bone scan is an imaging test used to diagnose problems with your bones [25]. A relatively small quantity of a radioactive substance called a radiopharmaceutical is used safely.…”

Section: Investigationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications in Fracture Healing-A Review

Gopalakrishnan

Priyadharshini

Sinduja

2021

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complications are a reality in healing fractures. Most can be stopped or reduced by being aware of their pathophysiology. Others, though, are inevitable, but their Early diagnosis and effective treatment can help recovery. Significant complications Are Osteomyelitis, delayed union, non-union, malunion, premature union, which were a result of fracture repair. Keeping these complications into consideration Presurgical patient assessment as well as postoperative treatment should be taken into account. The goal of fracture repair is to ascertain rigid fixation and perfect alignment of the bone to permit each timely and maximized come to perform in the affected space. The particular injury, species and breed conformation, age, general health, concomitant malady processes, nutrition, and medications all play a job in healing and, therefore, response to the repair. However, these factors don't seem to be the sole determinants of outcome. the strategy of repair and surgical technique each play a vital role within the outcome of fracture management. For this reason, it's vitally necessary that the practitioner be aware of potential complications of fracture repair and take steps to stop them. This review centers on how these complications can be prevented, understood and handled.

show abstract

Semi-quantitative CT scoring of nailed shaft fractures during normal healing and in non-unions: comparison with radiographic scoring

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Reliability of the Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) for Femoral Shaft Fractures

Reliability of the Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) for Femoral Shaft Fractures

Complications in Fracture Healing-A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About