“…Conventional methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS/PAGE), electrochemical assays, colorimetric assays, and bioluminescent sensors have been established for GSTs activity detection. , However, these methods suffer from disadvantages such as being time-consuming, requiring a lengthy preparation stage, high sample consumption, and lack of sensitivity. − Recently, luminescence imaging has emerged as a promising technique for the detection of disease-related proteins due to its high sensitivity, noninvasive modality, and dynamic measurement ability. − A range of fluorescent probes have been reported for GSTs based on the GSH nucleophilic substitution reaction catalyzed by GSTs, and these can be mainly divided into nitro group substitution reactions and sulfonyl cleavage reactions. ,− Luminescent transition complexes possess desirable photophysical properties (e.g., long emission lifetimes, high photostability, and wide Stokes shifts) which render them ideal imaging probes for biomolecules. − Very recently, the Yuan group developed a ruthenium(II) complex for imaging GSTs in a drug-induced liver injury model based on a nitro group substitution reaction. , However, activity-based probes requiring the use of GSH may be susceptible to interference by metal ions and biomolecules in biological systems. Moreover, activity-based GSTs probes that depend heavily on nucleophilic substitution reactions are easily perturbed by the high concentration of nucleophilic molecules in the cellular environment, especially thiols (mM level). , …”