Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conferen 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d19-1274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised Entity Alignment via Joint Knowledge Embedding Model and Cross-graph Model

Abstract: Entity alignment aims at integrating complementary knowledge graphs (KGs) from different sources or languages, which may benefit many knowledge-driven applications. It is challenging due to the heterogeneity of KGs and limited seed alignments. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised entity alignment method by joint Knowledge Embedding model and Cross-Graph model (KECG). It can make better use of seed alignments to propagate over the entire graphs with KG-based constraints. Specifically, as for the knowledg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With our ongoing evaluation efforts -the KG track will be part of OAEI 2020 again -we provide a testbed for new and improved solutions in that field. Moreover, a few approaches for the task of knowledge graph matching have been published in the recent past (e.g., [20,27,29]), which have been evaluated on different datasets (and in closed domain settings only), hence, their results are not directly comparable. By providing a generic benchmark including both open and closed domain settings, we enable a more systematic comparison for such works in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With our ongoing evaluation efforts -the KG track will be part of OAEI 2020 again -we provide a testbed for new and improved solutions in that field. Moreover, a few approaches for the task of knowledge graph matching have been published in the recent past (e.g., [20,27,29]), which have been evaluated on different datasets (and in closed domain settings only), hence, their results are not directly comparable. By providing a generic benchmark including both open and closed domain settings, we enable a more systematic comparison for such works in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are mainly three categories of EA models. The first group of studies merely harness the KG structure to align entities, and representative work includes [4,6,14]. The second category of methods iteratively label most likely aligned entity pairs as the additional training data and progressively enhance the alignment performance [22,41,42].…”
Section: Definition 3 (Entity Alignment)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then several methods, such as ITransE [50], IPTransE [50] and BootEA [32] leverage the bootstrapping strategy to address the lack of labeled data. Further, semi-supervised approaches [18,26,27] were developed to utilize the unlabeled data for enhancing the performance of entity alignment. Moreover, several works consider to jointly model the structure and attribute information of KGs [6,31,34], or the structure and relation information [29,51] or the structure, relation and attribute information together [49]; 2) Graph Neural Network-based methods.…”
Section: Entity Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods are often designed to address the alignment problem in a supervised way with human-designed features [23] or with entity representations learned from KG embedding approaches [6,7,31,38]. Also, a few semi-supervised methods [18,26,27] were proposed to make use of unlabeled data to enhance the performance of supervised entity alignment. Supervised or semi-supervised alignment methods have made remarkable discovery of semantically related entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%