2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19803-8_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised Keypoint Detector and Descriptor for Retinal Image Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the registration performance of our work, we compare it with both traditional methods (SIFT (Lowe 2004), PBO (Oinonen et al 2010), REMPE (Hernandez-Matas, Zabulis, and Argyros 2020)) and deep learningbased methods (SuperPoint (DeTone, Malisiewicz, and Rabinovich 2018), GLAMpoints (Truong et al 2019), R2D2 (Revaud et al 2019), SuperGlue (Sarlin et al 2020), NCNet (Rocco et al 2020), SuperRetina (Liu et al 2022)). Table 1 summarizes the comparison among these methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To demonstrate the registration performance of our work, we compare it with both traditional methods (SIFT (Lowe 2004), PBO (Oinonen et al 2010), REMPE (Hernandez-Matas, Zabulis, and Argyros 2020)) and deep learningbased methods (SuperPoint (DeTone, Malisiewicz, and Rabinovich 2018), GLAMpoints (Truong et al 2019), R2D2 (Revaud et al 2019), SuperGlue (Sarlin et al 2020), NCNet (Rocco et al 2020), SuperRetina (Liu et al 2022)). Table 1 summarizes the comparison among these methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To match the keypoints based on descriptors, we first train a SuperGlue (Sarlin et al 2020) model based on optimal transport. Then a mapping between the two images is computed using homography given matched points, following many earlier methods (DeTone, Malisiewicz, and Rabinovich 2018; Sarlin et al 2020;Liu et al 2022). Homography estimation is a good solution for linear registration tasks as it reduces errors in keypoint detection and matching.…”
Section: Retinal Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare with the following five domain-specific methods: REMPE [42], HM-16 [43], Harris-PIIFD [44], GDB-ICP [45], and SuperRetina [46].…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%