2016
DOI: 10.3366/ijhac.2016.0160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised Textual Analysis and Historical Research Helping Each Other: Some Thoughts and Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we present and address the entity-aspect linking task in particular to meet the demands of the elds of Digital Humanities and Computational Social Science [15,34]. ese communities o en employ entity-linking as a semantically explicit alternative to Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) [3,4] for corpus exploration and topic-based document selection [19,31], as latent topics detected by LDA are often di cult to interpret and evaluate [7,24,45]. To satisfy the need of ne-grained interpretable topics, we have developed a system that adopts and provides explicit representations of pre-de ned entity-aspects harvested from Wikipedia.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present and address the entity-aspect linking task in particular to meet the demands of the elds of Digital Humanities and Computational Social Science [15,34]. ese communities o en employ entity-linking as a semantically explicit alternative to Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) [3,4] for corpus exploration and topic-based document selection [19,31], as latent topics detected by LDA are often di cult to interpret and evaluate [7,24,45]. To satisfy the need of ne-grained interpretable topics, we have developed a system that adopts and provides explicit representations of pre-de ned entity-aspects harvested from Wikipedia.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the absence of a solid knowledge of data analysis has serious consequences for the humanities scholar who intends to use text mining methodologies, since it can limit both his/her capacity to engineer/re-adjust features and to adapt the chosen computational technique (as also remarked in [57]). Moreover, his/her understanding of quantitative results will be always partial, compared to the one exhibited by other researchers from other disciplines (such as computational linguistics [37], natural language processing [58] or information retrieval [36]) that are currently also experimenting with text mining methods to solve humanities tasks.…”
Section: A Generation Of Humanists-machine Learning Experienced Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a direct consequence of this fact, digital humanities scholars are currently stuck in a situation where they adopt topic models because they have a strong need for the potential benefits offered by such a method, especially now that large collections of primary sources are available for the first time in digital format. However, at the same time, scholars cannot derive new humanities knowledge from adopting topic models, given the current limitations of the results obtained (Schmidt 2012b;Nanni, Kümper, and Ponzetto 2016). Specific Contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%