Field evaluations and comparisons of continuous fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) mass measurement technologies at an urban and a rural site in New York state are performed. The continuous measurement technologies include the filter dynamics measurement system (FDMS) tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) monitor, the stand-alone TEOM monitor (without the FDMS), and the beta attenuation monitor (BAM). These continuous measurement methods are also compared with 24-hr integrated filters collected and analyzed under the Federal Reference Method (FRM) protocol. The measurement sites are New York City (the borough of Queens) and Addison, a rural area of southwestern New York state. New York City data comparisons between the FDMS TEOM, BAM, and FRM are examined for bias and seasonality during a 2-yr period. Data comparisons for the FDMS TEOM and FRM from the Addison location are examined for the same 2-yr period. The BAM and FDMS measurements at Queens are highly correlated with each other and the FRM. The BAM and FDMS are very similar to each other in magnitude, and both are ϳ25% higher than the FRM filter measurements at this site. The FDMS at Addison measures ϳ9% more mass than the FRM. Mass reconstructions using the speciation trends network filter data are examined to provide insight as to the contribution of volatile species of PM 2.5 in the FDMS mass measurement and the fraction that is likely lost in the FRM mass measurement. The reconstructed mass at Queens is systematically lower than the FDMS by ϳ10%.
INTRODUCTIONAs part of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-sponsored Particulate Matter Technology Assessment and Characterization Study-New York (PMTACS-NY) Supersite Program, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center (ASRC) at the University at Albany have collaboratively operated urban and rural measurement sites with collocated filter dynamics measurement system (FDMS) tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) monitors, standard TEOM monitors, beta attenuation monitors (BAMs), and Federal Reference Method (FRM) samplers for the past several years. Part of the research design, and a major program goal of the PMTACS-NY program, includes the evaluation of emerging instrumentation and technology transfer from the research arena to routine application. These new instruments are operated and evaluated by a mixture of university and state agency staff with the expectation that the final commercial version of each instrument will be reliable and