1996
DOI: 10.1086/177797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semianalytic Predictions for Statistical Properties of X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies in Cold Dark Matter Universes

Abstract: Temperature and luminosity functions of X-ray clusters are computed semi-analytically, combining a simple model for the cluster gas properties with the distribution functions of halo formation epochs proposed by Lacey & Cole (1993) and . In contrast to several previous approaches which apply the Press-Schechter mass function in a straightforward manner, our method can explicitly take into account the temperature and luminosity evolution of clusters. In order to make quantitative predictions in a specific cosmo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
416
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
416
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, these comparisons must take into account many of the issues that arise in a spatially averaged context, such as the best choice of collapse density c (e.g., Kitayama & Suto 1996;Sheth, Mo, & Tormen 2001;Jenkins et al 2001), possible corrections to the overall functional form of the mass function (e.g., Jenkins et al 2001;Lee & Shandarin 1998), and the relationship between the Eulerian coordinate system which is observed and the Lagrangian coordinates that are used in the excursion-set formalism (e.g., Catelan et al 1998;Jing 1999). While the study of such issues will sharpen the link between this formalism and more directly observable quantities, our method nevertheless already provides an important first step towards a better theoretical understanding of inhomogeneous structure formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, these comparisons must take into account many of the issues that arise in a spatially averaged context, such as the best choice of collapse density c (e.g., Kitayama & Suto 1996;Sheth, Mo, & Tormen 2001;Jenkins et al 2001), possible corrections to the overall functional form of the mass function (e.g., Jenkins et al 2001;Lee & Shandarin 1998), and the relationship between the Eulerian coordinate system which is observed and the Lagrangian coordinates that are used in the excursion-set formalism (e.g., Catelan et al 1998;Jing 1999). While the study of such issues will sharpen the link between this formalism and more directly observable quantities, our method nevertheless already provides an important first step towards a better theoretical understanding of inhomogeneous structure formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantity, which depends weakly on Ω for the ΛCDM family of models, is well-approximated by (Kitayama & Suto 1996). The rationale for including it came from the fact that they used the virial density to find haloes, and the same model which predicts this virial density also predicts δc.…”
Section: Model For the Halo Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above equation, z is the redshift of the cluster, which for simplicity we assume is equal to the cluster formation epoch (see Kitayama & Suto 1996 for more discussion on this point). While the cluster temperature may not be isothermal, this is not important in our analysis.…”
Section: Modeling the Two-point Correlation Functions Of X-ray Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details of the temperature-mass relation and its nonisothermal e †ect are discussed in , Yoshikawa, Itoh, & Suto (1998), , and Yoshikawa & Suto (1999). We compute the ratio of the * vir , mean cluster density to the mean density of the universe at that epoch, using the formulae for the spherical collapse model presented in Kitayama & Suto (1996).…”
Section: Modeling the Two-point Correlation Functions Of X-ray Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%