2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiautomated Segmentation of Pleural Effusions in MDCT Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results concur with the findings of previous studies regarding the degree of correlation between pleural effusion and estimated pleural effusion on CT [4,5]. This observation is important: our approach is comparable to the approach of ultrasonography and chest radiography where practicality is also often more important than accuracy [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results concur with the findings of previous studies regarding the degree of correlation between pleural effusion and estimated pleural effusion on CT [4,5]. This observation is important: our approach is comparable to the approach of ultrasonography and chest radiography where practicality is also often more important than accuracy [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, measurements could be affected by respiration. However, both the observation that the typical crescent-like shape of non-loculated pleural effusions is also present in postmortem CT and the agreement between previous clinical studies and our results suggest that this effect may not significantly affect volume estimation [4,5]. Second, there were no cases with loculated pleural effusions in our population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best segmentation method presented so far came from von Falck et al . [14], but it is not (yet) fully automatic. Though they were able to cut segmentation time by three quarters without sacrificing much segmentation quality, that the software requires physician time at all makes it less than ideal as a routine diagnostic tool (though it may be valuable in special cases).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%