1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiautomatic disabbreviation of technical text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already noted the similarity of the current work to that of Rowe and Laitinen (1995), discussed in Section 2.3. There is also a similarity between the current work and work reported in Taghva and Gilbreth (1995) on using approximate string matching methods to induce interpretations of acronyms or letter sequences from their full word expansions found somewhere in the immediate context of the given letter sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have already noted the similarity of the current work to that of Rowe and Laitinen (1995), discussed in Section 2.3. There is also a similarity between the current work and work reported in Taghva and Gilbreth (1995) on using approximate string matching methods to induce interpretations of acronyms or letter sequences from their full word expansions found somewhere in the immediate context of the given letter sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In particular, if there is a text that only refers to the Dow Jones with the letter sequence DJIA, that text would not be retrieved. Rowe and Laitinen (1995) describe a semiautomatic procedure for guessing the expansion of novel abbreviations in text. Their method depends upon dictionaries of known full words, and dictionaries of known abbreviations and their expansions.…”
Section: Text Retrieval Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons for F5 and F6 are done after conversion to lower case, and F6 ignores the common words of English not nouns, verbs, adjectives, or adverbs (numbers and 154 special words including "and", "the", "ours", "of", "without", "when"), with exceptions for spatial and temporal prepositions. F6 also checks for abbreviations within the file name of words or pairs of words in the caption with methods from Rowe and Laitinen (1995). http://faculty.nps.edu/ncrowe/marie/webpics.html Figure 3 includes statistics on caption processing, and the lower-left curve in Figure 4 is the recall-precision curve for the output of the caption neuron for the test set after training on the training set.…”
Section: The Caption Neuronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have several hundred rules for special formats including multiword ones, which interpret "bu# 462945" as an aircraft identification number by its front word, "sawtooth mountains" as mountains by its tail word, "02/21/93" as a date, "10-20m" as a range of meters, "visit/dedication" as a conjunction, and "shiploading" as a noun-gerund equivalent of an adjective. Misspellings and abbreviations were obtained mostly automatically, with human post-checking, using the methods described in (Rowe and Laitinen, 1995). Lexical ellipsis (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%