2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/5/053030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiclassical analysis of Bose–Hubbard dynamics

Abstract: In this work the two-site Bose-Hubbard model is studied analytically in the limit of weak coupling u and large number of particles N. In particular, the difference in the occupation between the two sites, where initially all particles are at one site, was calculated analytically. This quantity exhibits collapses and revivals that superimpose rapid oscillations. Excellent agreement with the exact numerical solution was found. The semiclassical approximation where N 1 plays the role of Planckʼs constant was used… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Tunneling" refers to linear coupling between the condensates (quadratic in operators) while "interactions" refer to a nonlinear self-particle quartic term. In this sense, Josephson's physics is a limiting case of the Bose-Hubbard model [14], although the name retained a strong bond with superconductors [15], possibly due to the important applications it found as a quantum interference device [16,17] or merely for historical reasons (the Josephson-Bardeen debate on the existence of the effect is one highlight of scientific controversies [18]). To mark this difference, one speaks of "Bosonic Josephson junctions" (BJJ) for bosonic implementations of the Josephson dynamics [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Tunneling" refers to linear coupling between the condensates (quadratic in operators) while "interactions" refer to a nonlinear self-particle quartic term. In this sense, Josephson's physics is a limiting case of the Bose-Hubbard model [14], although the name retained a strong bond with superconductors [15], possibly due to the important applications it found as a quantum interference device [16,17] or merely for historical reasons (the Josephson-Bardeen debate on the existence of the effect is one highlight of scientific controversies [18]). To mark this difference, one speaks of "Bosonic Josephson junctions" (BJJ) for bosonic implementations of the Josephson dynamics [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the relationship between quantum and mean field descriptions of Bose gases is essentially quantum-classical correspondence [15][16][17] with 1/N (N is the total number of bosons) serves as effective Planck constant. Our results above can be straightforwardly applied to any system of Bose gas which is integrable as it was done for chaotic Bose system in Ref.…”
Section: Bose Gasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we study systematically the quantumclassical correspondence in integrable systems. We find * Electronic address: wubiao@pku.edu.cn that the quantum-classical correspondence is characterized by two time scales, Ehrenfest time τ and quantum revival time T r [13][14][15], as shown in Fig.1. According to this figure, for a fixed Planck constant, the wave packet dynamics is almost classical when the evolution time is shorter than the Ehrenfest time τ ; when the evolution time is longer than T r , quantum revival occurs and the wave packet dynamics can no longer be approximated by semiclassical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The interactions between the bosons can be characterized by a dimensionless coupling parameter [36,[43][44][45][46][47][48] …”
Section: D Bose-hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%