2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0055515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiconducting character of LaN: Magnitude of the bandgap and origin of the electrical conductivity

Abstract: Lanthanum nitride (LaN) has attracted research interest in catalysis due to its ability to activate the triple bonds of N 2 molecules, enabling efficient and cost-effective synthesis of ammonia from N 2 gas. While exciting progress has been made to use LaN in functional applications, the electronic character of LaN (metallic, semi-metallic, or semiconducting) and magnitude of its band gap have so far not been conclusively determined. Here, we investigate the electronic properties of LaN with hybrid density fun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From figure 7(A, a) and table S1, it is clearly seen that both SCF as well as the nSCF calculations at PBE+U+ SOC, PBESOL + U + SOC, PW91 + U + SOC, TB09 + U + SOC and HSE06 + U + SOC level of theories underestimate the experimental band gap (E g ∼ 0.82 eV) reported elsewhere [57]. In this connection it may be relevant to mention that although Yan et al reported E g ∼ 0.82 respectively for the compound with HSE06 functional in complete agreement with the experimental observation, however our calculations with the same functional (HSE06) estimate Eg to be ∼0.60 , 0.62 eV for both SCF ,nSCF approaches in line with the existing literature [59]. Interestingly in our case E g ∼ 0.804 (0.80) eV, has been estimated from B3LYP + U + SOC level of theory for SCF (nSCF) calculations.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structures Of Lan Under Ambient and External...supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From figure 7(A, a) and table S1, it is clearly seen that both SCF as well as the nSCF calculations at PBE+U+ SOC, PBESOL + U + SOC, PW91 + U + SOC, TB09 + U + SOC and HSE06 + U + SOC level of theories underestimate the experimental band gap (E g ∼ 0.82 eV) reported elsewhere [57]. In this connection it may be relevant to mention that although Yan et al reported E g ∼ 0.82 respectively for the compound with HSE06 functional in complete agreement with the experimental observation, however our calculations with the same functional (HSE06) estimate Eg to be ∼0.60 , 0.62 eV for both SCF ,nSCF approaches in line with the existing literature [59]. Interestingly in our case E g ∼ 0.804 (0.80) eV, has been estimated from B3LYP + U + SOC level of theory for SCF (nSCF) calculations.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structures Of Lan Under Ambient and External...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In fact much closer value of E g with the experimental observations had also been reported from the first-principle calculations using HSE functional (E g = 0.82 eV) [58]. However, even with simple inclusion of range separation parameter 'ω = 0.11 Bohr −1 ', HSE06, HSE06 + GW and HSE06 + spin-orbit coupling (SOC) levels of theory although predict direct band gaps with E g = 0.75, 0.68 and 0.62 eV respectively, but their estimated values are well deviated from the experimental observations [59]. The results from the first-principle calculations thus indicate the sensitivity of the HSE functional with 'ω' in reproducing the band gap energy of the compound under study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%