Semidiscrete biomass dynamic modeling: an improved approach for assessing fish stock responses to pulsed harvest events

Abstract

Continuous harvest over an annual period is a common assumption of continuous biomass dynamics models (CBDMs); however, fish are frequently harvested in a discrete manner. We developed semidiscrete biomass dynamics models (SDBDMs) that allow discrete harvest events and evaluated differences between CBDMs and SDBDMs using an equilibrium yield analysis with varying levels of fishing mortality (F). Equilibrium fishery yields for CBDMs and SDBDMS were similar at low fishing mortalities and diverged as F approached and exceeded maximum sustained yield (F MSY ). Discrete harvest resulted in lower equilibrium yields at high levels of Frelative to continuous harvest. The effect of applying harvest continuously when it was in fact discrete was evaluated by fitting CBDMs and SDBDMs to time series data generated from a hypothetical fish stock undergoing discrete harvest and evaluating parameter estimates bias. Violating the assumption of continuous harvest resulted in biased parameter estimates for CBDM while SDBDM parameter estimates were unbiased. Biased parameter estimates resulted in biased biological reference points derived from CBDMs. Semidiscrete BDMs outperformed continuous BDMs and should be used when harvest is discrete, when the time and magnitude of harvest are known, and when F is greater than F MSY . RightsWorks produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted. Continuous harvest over an annual period is a common assumption of continuous biomass dynamics models (CBDMs); however, fish are frequently harvested in a discrete manner. We developed semidiscrete biomass dynamics models (SDBDMs) that allow discrete harvest events and evaluated differences between CBDMs and SDBDMs using an equilibrium yield analysis with varying levels of fishing mortality (F). Equilibrium fishery yields for CBDMs and SDBDMS were similar at low fishing mortalities and diverged as F approached and exceeded maximum sustained yield (FMSY). Discrete harvest resulted in lower equilibrium yields at high levels of F relative to continuous harvest. The effect of applying harvest continuously when it was in fact discrete was evaluated by fitting CBDMs and SDBDMs to time series data generated from a hypothetical fish stock undergoing discrete harvest and evaluating parameter estimates bias. Violating the assumption of continuous harvest resulted in biased parameter estimates for CBDM while SDBDM parameter estimates were unbiased. Biased parameter estimates resulted in biased biological reference points derived from CBDMs. Semidiscrete BDMs outperformed continuous BDMs and should be used when harvest is discrete, when the time and magnitude of harvest are known, and when F is greater than FMSY.Résumé : Si les modèles continus de dynamique de la biomasse (CBDM) partent souvent du principe que la capture est continue au cours d'une période annuelle, les prises de poissons s'effectuent fréquemment de manière discrète. Nous avon...

Data Curation, Fisheries, and Ecosystem-based Management: the Case Study of the Pecheker Database

“…Knowing such details of these evolutions in time is very important to assess the raw data quality, for the standardization of the datasets extracted from Pecheker to be used as inputs for the fish biomass estimation models (McCluskey and Lewison, 2008;Rosenberg et al, 2005). Variations in the preliminary treatment of these inputs may induce variations in the final biomass assessment results (Colvin et al, 2012;Romagnoni et al, 2012), which is particularly sensitive regarding both economic and biodiversity conservation issues for…”

A food web modeling assessment of Asian Carp impacts in the Middle and Upper Mississippi River, USA

“…Many studies have addressed the negative effects of carps (Forester and Lawrence, 1978;Miller and Crowl, 2006;Irons et al, 2007;Dibble and Kovalenko, 2009;Sampson et al, 2009;Kloskowski, 2011). As a result, focus in the literature has included methods of carp eradication and the effort required (Ricker and Gottschalk, 1941;Rose and Moen, 1953;Weber et al, 2011;Colvin et al, 2012aColvin et al, , 2012bSeibert et al, 2015). One recent approach used the spawning potential ratio (SPR) to identify the most efficient level of exploitation to successfully reduce invasive carps (Weber et al, 2011;Seibert et al, 2015).…”

“…Historically, SPR modeling has been used to make management decisions focused on protecting fishes from overfishing (Goodyear, 1993;Quist et al, 2002;Quist et al, 2010). Another recent approach (Colvin et al, 2012a(Colvin et al, , 2012b uses biomass dynamics modeling and the ecotrophic coefficient to estimate levels of harvest necessary to achieve various levels of control. Regardless of how SPR, biomass dynamics, or ecotrophic coefficient modeling are used, the input and the results generated provide insight into only one species or a group of similar taxonomy.…”