1979
DOI: 10.2307/2006068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semidiscretization in Time for Parabolic Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in [4,17], the authors have shown that the infinite dimensional setting implies the restriction…”
Section: ) Where U Is a H-valued Random Process A : D(a) ⊂ H → H Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [4,17], the authors have shown that the infinite dimensional setting implies the restriction…”
Section: ) Where U Is a H-valued Random Process A : D(a) ⊂ H → H Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove Theorem 1, we follow the method of LeRoux [9]. (See also Theorem 4.1 of [7], Theorem 17.1 of [8], and Theorem 8.4 of [15]) On the other hand, the proof of Theorems 2 and 3 will be accomplished in the same line as [7] and [8].…”
Section: R(tn A)r(tt-a) R (1a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the following stability result, which itself is worth stating separately, plays an important role. (Tr-iA) ... r(-r,A)11 <''atn a p (9) where Ca is a positive constant depending on a. Moreover Ca is independent of A, n and {r3 }.…”
Section: R(tn A)r(tt-a) R (1a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them are concerned with the discretisation of problems with constant operator A (see, e.g., [5][6][7][8][9]). Other studies (see, e.g., [10][11][12][13]), study the general case where the operator A is time-dependent, under Hölder or Lipschitz-continuity assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%