2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiempirical photospheric models of a solar flare on May 28, 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, it was shown that the magnetic field distribution versus height may be non-monotonous, with a narrow peak in the range of the upper photosphere [3,7]. In other flares such nonmonotonous changes were not observed [8][9][10]. A possible reason for this disagreement is that the character of the altitude distribution of the magnetic field in the area of a flare can depend on the phase of the development of the flare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, it was shown that the magnetic field distribution versus height may be non-monotonous, with a narrow peak in the range of the upper photosphere [3,7]. In other flares such nonmonotonous changes were not observed [8][9][10]. A possible reason for this disagreement is that the character of the altitude distribution of the magnetic field in the area of a flare can depend on the phase of the development of the flare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Напруженість магнітного поля зменшується з 0,12-0,18 Тл (log  = 0) до 0,055-0,11Тл (log  = -3). Низхідні потоки існували у фазі загасання спалаху [14]. спалахом швидкість висхідних потоків у верхній хромосфері змінювалася від 25 до 0 км/с.…”
unclassified