2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2006.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiempirical tight-binding modelling of III-N-based heterostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy minima occurs at the values of a 0 = 5.371, 5.632 and 6.198 Å for ZnS, ZnSe and ZnTe, respectively. Our results are very close to other calculated values [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Also the calculated lattice constants agree well with the experimental values of 5.412, 5.667 and 6.103 Å, respectively, with the maximal error of 1.53%.…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The energy minima occurs at the values of a 0 = 5.371, 5.632 and 6.198 Å for ZnS, ZnSe and ZnTe, respectively. Our results are very close to other calculated values [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Also the calculated lattice constants agree well with the experimental values of 5.412, 5.667 and 6.103 Å, respectively, with the maximal error of 1.53%.…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, a even more precise calculation can be done within the state-of-art quasiparticle calculation based on the GW approximation [17] There are few TB parameters published in the literature for the compounds considered here. In the work of Gürel and collaborators [18], the authors use sp 3 s * basis set with orbital interaction up to second neighbors, but only the hoppings between second neighbors p orbitals are considered, all the others being set to zero. However, the authors in the paper not present a comparison between the resulting bands with bands calculated with other methods: just the energies in the high-symmetry points of the BZ are presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many attempts have been made to understand the effect of strain from theoretical perspectives. The electronic properties of semiconductor materials have been previously analyzed by: (a) empirical or semiempirical methods such as the local/nonlocal empirical pseudopotential method [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71], the semi-empirical tight-binding method [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84], the k • p method [85][86][87][88][89][90]; or by (b) first-principles methods [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] such as density functional theory (DFT) [91,[99][100][101][102][103][104]. Although empirical and semi-empirical methods are computationally efficient and often easy to apply, they rely on many empirical fitting parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%