Abstract:Abstract. Let X be a linear space over the field K of real or complex numbers and (S, •) be a semigroup. We determine all solutions of the functional equationin the class of pairs of functions (f,g) such that f : X → S and g : X → K satisfies some regularity assumptions. Several consequences of this result are presented.
“…We claim that in this case (d) is valid. In view of (29)-(30), in order to show this, it is enough to prove that g(x) = 0 for every (6) and so, in view of (31), we obtain that g(x) ≥ 0. Thus, taking a y ∈ C (3) , we get x + g(x)sy ∈ C for s ∈ [0, ∞).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus from (45) we derive that x + g(x)sy / ∈ C (1) ∪ C (3) for s ∈ [0, ∞) and so, as C (4) = C (5) = ∅, we get x + g(x)sy ∈ C (6) for s ∈ [0, ∞). Therefore, taking into account (29) and (45), we obtain Furthermore, L(y) > 0 because y ∈ C (3) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, in order to complete the proof, it is enough to show that at most one of the sets C (i) for i ∈ {4, 5, 6} is nonempty. For the proof by contradiction suppose that C ( j 1 ) = ∅ and C ( j 2 ) = ∅ for some j 1 , j 2 ∈ {4, 5, 6}, (6) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further going pexiderization of the Gołab-Schinzel equation have been investigated in [5]- [6] and [10]- [11]. In a recent paper [8] the results of [1] and [19] have been generalized.…”
Section: F(x + G(x)y) = F(x)f(y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then t x + g(t x)t y = t x + g x (t)t y = t x + t y ∈ C for t ∈ [0, ∞) and so, taking into account (6) and (21), we get…”
Section: Proposition 21 Assume That Functions F G : C → R Are Contimentioning
We determine the solutions of conditional composite type functional equations related to some problems in mathematical meteorology and fluid mechanics.
“…We claim that in this case (d) is valid. In view of (29)-(30), in order to show this, it is enough to prove that g(x) = 0 for every (6) and so, in view of (31), we obtain that g(x) ≥ 0. Thus, taking a y ∈ C (3) , we get x + g(x)sy ∈ C for s ∈ [0, ∞).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus from (45) we derive that x + g(x)sy / ∈ C (1) ∪ C (3) for s ∈ [0, ∞) and so, as C (4) = C (5) = ∅, we get x + g(x)sy ∈ C (6) for s ∈ [0, ∞). Therefore, taking into account (29) and (45), we obtain Furthermore, L(y) > 0 because y ∈ C (3) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, in order to complete the proof, it is enough to show that at most one of the sets C (i) for i ∈ {4, 5, 6} is nonempty. For the proof by contradiction suppose that C ( j 1 ) = ∅ and C ( j 2 ) = ∅ for some j 1 , j 2 ∈ {4, 5, 6}, (6) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further going pexiderization of the Gołab-Schinzel equation have been investigated in [5]- [6] and [10]- [11]. In a recent paper [8] the results of [1] and [19] have been generalized.…”
Section: F(x + G(x)y) = F(x)f(y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then t x + g(t x)t y = t x + g x (t)t y = t x + t y ∈ C for t ∈ [0, ∞) and so, taking into account (6) and (21), we get…”
Section: Proposition 21 Assume That Functions F G : C → R Are Contimentioning
We determine the solutions of conditional composite type functional equations related to some problems in mathematical meteorology and fluid mechanics.
Abstract. Let X be a real linear space. We characterize solutions f, g : X → R of the equation f (x + g(x)y) = f (x)f (y), where f is continuous on rays. Our result refers to papers by
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.