2021
DOI: 10.1214/21-ejp654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semigroups for one-dimensional Schrödinger operators with multiplicative Gaussian noise

Abstract: Let H := − 1 2 ∆ + V be a one-dimensional continuum Schrödinger operator. Consider H := H +ξ, where ξ is a translation invariant Gaussian noise. Under some assumptions on ξ, we prove that if V is locally integrable, bounded below, and grows faster than log at infinity, then the semigroup e −tĤ is trace class and admits a probabilistic representation via a Feynman-Kac formula. Our result applies to operators acting on the whole line R, the half line (0, ∞), or a bounded interval (0, b), with a variety of bounda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof for the B t,u (x, y) part is similar, see also [17,Lemma 5.6] for a similar statement. for some constants c, C > 0 independent of t. Thus by independence we have E e 4At,u(x,y) Therefore, we can find constants C, c > 0 such that for any t ∈ (0, 1] and u > 0 fixed we have (0,∞) 2 E e 4At,u(x,y) 1/4 e −(x−y) 2 /c dxdy ≤ C (0,∞) 2 e −yu/2−(x−y) 2 /c dxdy < ∞.…”
Section: Technical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proof for the B t,u (x, y) part is similar, see also [17,Lemma 5.6] for a similar statement. for some constants c, C > 0 independent of t. Thus by independence we have E e 4At,u(x,y) Therefore, we can find constants C, c > 0 such that for any t ∈ (0, 1] and u > 0 fixed we have (0,∞) 2 E e 4At,u(x,y) 1/4 e −(x−y) 2 /c dxdy ≤ C (0,∞) 2 e −yu/2−(x−y) 2 /c dxdy < ∞.…”
Section: Technical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The spectrum of the stochastic Airy operator was first constructed using the form (2.1) in [3,30]. The following statement is a special case of [17, Propositions 3.2 and 3.4] (see also [26]): 3,17,26,30]). Let β > 0 and w ∈ (−∞, ∞].…”
Section: Setup and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. of multiplicity one and the corresponding eigenfunctions (ψ k ) k≥1 , normalized in L 2 (0, ∞), are Hölder functions of regularity index 3/2 − , see [RRV11,Gau19]. Up to rescaling the eigenvalues / eigenfunctions appropriately (see Remark 1.1 below), it is equivalent to consider the operator…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%