2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(02)00162-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiochemicals from ovaries of gravid females attract ovipositing female houseflies, Musca domestica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wiesmann (1962) concluded that motionless feeding flies are the primary visual cue in food searching behavior, which was later confirmed by Collins and Bell (1996). Sex pheromones in the form of cuticular hydrocarbons also trigger excitatory responses and attraction (e.g., Richter et al 1976) even in females (Jiang et al 2002). Lastly, our results could be affected by multiple simultaneous crossings in the high density treatments, but multiple simultaneous crossings were considered a very rare event and therefore not likely to affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiesmann (1962) concluded that motionless feeding flies are the primary visual cue in food searching behavior, which was later confirmed by Collins and Bell (1996). Sex pheromones in the form of cuticular hydrocarbons also trigger excitatory responses and attraction (e.g., Richter et al 1976) even in females (Jiang et al 2002). Lastly, our results could be affected by multiple simultaneous crossings in the high density treatments, but multiple simultaneous crossings were considered a very rare event and therefore not likely to affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest a possible aggregative function of the cuticular hydrocarbons. Typically, males produce aggregation pheromones, but there are several exceptions (Jiang et al ., ; Judd & Borden, ; Wertheim et al ., ). Insect response to an aggregation pheromone is known to be largely affected by physiological state (e.g., hunger, mating condition, age, and molting cycle) and extrinsic factors (e.g., time of day, season, density of conspecifics of same or opposite sex, and temperature) (Aller & Cladwell, ; Bartelt & Jackson, ; Joosse, ; Lorenzo Figuerias et al ., ; Mayhew & Phillips, ; Schaner et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probable reason why females choose to lay their eggs in places containing initial ovipositions is the attraction that they wield in these individuals, due to pheromones released either by other females or by the eggs (Norris 1965, BartonBrowne et al 1969, Hough et al 1982, Hanski 1987, Esser 1990, Judd & Borden 1992, Jiang et al 2002, Brodie et al 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esser (1990) proved that females of Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) prefer laying eggs on substrates containing fresh, cospecific eggs. This behavior may be mediated by (i) pheromones produced by females that remain associated with eggs, making the substrate in which the eggs were laid attractive to other females (Jiang et al 2002); (ii) pheromones produced and released by females at the time of oviposition, which stimulates others to lay their eggs in nearby locations on the same substrate (Barton-Browne 1960, Norris 1965, Hanski 1987; (iii) semiochemicals produced by the salivary gland of females feeding on the substrate (Brodie et al 2014) or, possibly, as occurring in other Diptera; and (iv) volatiles produced by microorganisms associated with eggs laid by other females (Hough et al 1982, Judd & Borden 1992. However, it is likely that blowfly females could evaluate the suitability of the substrate, reducing the size of their egg clusters in sites with a high amount of eggs or larvae or searching for a new substrate to lay their eggs (Ives 1989), given that the choice for the oviposition site affects larval development, influencing the competition level for food and space and, consequently, the viability of the resulting adults (De Jong 1976, 1978.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%