Semiotic Vision of Ideologies

Abstract

Registro de acceso restringido Este recurso no está disponible en acceso abierto por política de la editorial. No obstante, se puede acceder al texto completo desde la Universitat Jaume I o si el usuario cuenta con suscripción. Registre d'accés restringit Aquest recurs no està disponible en accés obert per política de l'editorial. No obstant això, es pot accedir al text complet des de la Universitat Jaume I o si l'usuari compta amb subscripció. Restricted access item This item isn't open access because of publisher's policy. The full--text version is only available from Jaume I University or if the user has a running suscription to the publisher's contents.

What Are Ideological Systems?

“…In the Deontical Impure Systems (DIS) (Impure sets and their mathematical properties have been previously defined in Nescolarde Selva et al [27]) approach, the superstructure of social systems has been divided in two [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”

“…The believers work together and then experts work out what is the correct behavior, the "right" values and so on; (4) Language. A language L is the logical expression of an ideology relating one substantive (Substantive beliefs [36,37] make up a system's axioms, and most of the beliefs make up their theorems) belief [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] to the others in the belief system. Language is understood from repeated patterns in the use of sets of beliefs.…”

Structure and Superstructures in Complex Social Systems

“…This Doxical Space or belief space is a normative superstructure and includes ways of thinking about the economic and legal normative structures. Two superstructures are involved in this approach to DIS [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]:…”

“…Let r i k be a doxical relation belonging to a k sheaf [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] ( ) , with Ù being the function "and". We define the systemic significance s and there will also be a denotative significance d-s which is what we know of the significance s of an object in Reality that we call an absolute being.…”

“…In previous works, the authors have defined social systems as Deontic Impure Systems (DIS) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], and provided mathematical properties of their structure. These systems are considered impure because their elements are either living things or materials and what we know of them is constrained by our ways of thinking and may vary from person to person.…”