2001
DOI: 10.1198/016214501753381913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models and Their Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We pooled the data from multiple subjects within the same group using a mixed-effects framework to model B, the group-level baseline concentration, and (␣, ␤), the group-level regression coefficients for the linearized harmonic function. We fitted our model by using restricted maximum likelihood (34) and identified diurnal variation within a group by rejecting ␣ ϭ ␤ ϭ 0 by using an approximate F test (35). Given the three different hormones measured on two different groups of subjects, we adjusted for the six multiple comparisons by using a Bonferonni correction by setting P Ͻ 0.05͞6 ϭ 0.0083 as our nominal cutoff to identify diurnal variation.…”
Section: Diurnal Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We pooled the data from multiple subjects within the same group using a mixed-effects framework to model B, the group-level baseline concentration, and (␣, ␤), the group-level regression coefficients for the linearized harmonic function. We fitted our model by using restricted maximum likelihood (34) and identified diurnal variation within a group by rejecting ␣ ϭ ␤ ϭ 0 by using an approximate F test (35). Given the three different hormones measured on two different groups of subjects, we adjusted for the six multiple comparisons by using a Bonferonni correction by setting P Ͻ 0.05͞6 ϭ 0.0083 as our nominal cutoff to identify diurnal variation.…”
Section: Diurnal Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus has been on both semiparametric (e.g. see Ke and Wang, 2001;Li and Stengos, 1996;Ullah and Roy, 1998) and nonparametric estimation of random effects models (e.g. see Henderson and Ullah, 2005;Lin and Carroll, 2000Lin et al, 2004;Lin and Ying, 2001;Ruckstuhl et al, 2000;Wu and Zhang, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the truncated spectrum into the frequency domain results in a power spectrum that is dominated strongly by the main features (the bulges) of the reflectance spectrum. A low-dimensional parametric or semiparametric [22,27] non-linear model will suffice to describe these low-frequency features well. However, such models invariably relegate detail at higher frequencies to the residual variance despite the fact that group effects can be statistically significant at higher frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%