2002
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.396-402.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semisolid Casting of AlSi7Mg0.35 Alloy Produced by Low-Temperature Pouring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the grain size can reduce substantially without a significant change in the SDAS and consequently a more globular morphology is obtained. 32,37) To be able to characterize grain morphology it is initially important to define what different grain morphologies are. To do this, it is important to consider defining a characteristic SDAS for each alloy for a given set of solidification Grain Morphology of As-Cast Wrought Aluminium Alloysconditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the grain size can reduce substantially without a significant change in the SDAS and consequently a more globular morphology is obtained. 32,37) To be able to characterize grain morphology it is initially important to define what different grain morphologies are. To do this, it is important to consider defining a characteristic SDAS for each alloy for a given set of solidification Grain Morphology of As-Cast Wrought Aluminium Alloysconditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [143], have performed experiments with AlSi7Mg0.35 alloy with different pouring temperatures in a 50mm diameter mold. Using a stepped die for squeeze casting and reheating the produced billets from different pouring temperatures, they have shown that the low temperature poured material filled completely the die with negligible porosity (Figure 3.21).…”
Section: Liquidus or Low Superheat Castingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) (b) Figure 3.27: (a) Shape factor as a function of holding time, (b) average 3D particle diameter versus holding time [12] Wang et al [143][144][145] with experiments on A17SiO.35Mg in 50 mm steel mold and with different pouring temperatures, have shown that using both low pouring temperature and grain refining could optimize the structure during billet casting, partial remelting, and injecting. They confirmed that the addition of grain refiner imparts little effect on grain size for the casting condition used in their work but after isothermal holding at 580°C, they concluded that the grain refined samples attained a globular structure faster than the non grain refined alloy because of the more rosette like structure of the grain refined sample.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the limitations of this route is the minimum size of billet that may be sprayed. In general this method could be more expensive if compared with agitation routes such as MHD; however, it may have particular advantages with high temperature alloys such as steels and superalloys.Liquidus pouring temperature or low pouring temperature is another low cost alternative route to generate structures [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The ability of low superheats to bring temperature gradient homogeneity within Semi solid slugs results in equiaxed grain growth instead of columnar growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%