2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SemSur: A Core Ontology for the Semantic Representation of Research Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, based on the dataset, we would expect the response to CQ1 to be that LLMs (which are sub-types of GenAI) exhibit hallucination, and the response to CQ2 to be the Factuality hallucination type is the most frequent type to be present. To conduct the actual evaluation, as is standard in other related work, 46,47 we first translate the CQs (expressed informally in natural language as shown in Table 3) into formal SPARQL queries framed using the concepts and properties in HALO. We note that, because HALO contains both a Hallucination and Metadata module, it contains the necessary ontological elements for modeling the CQs as equivalent SPARQL queries.…”
Section: Ontology Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, based on the dataset, we would expect the response to CQ1 to be that LLMs (which are sub-types of GenAI) exhibit hallucination, and the response to CQ2 to be the Factuality hallucination type is the most frequent type to be present. To conduct the actual evaluation, as is standard in other related work, 46,47 we first translate the CQs (expressed informally in natural language as shown in Table 3) into formal SPARQL queries framed using the concepts and properties in HALO. We note that, because HALO contains both a Hallucination and Metadata module, it contains the necessary ontological elements for modeling the CQs as equivalent SPARQL queries.…”
Section: Ontology Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenResearch.org does not only represent scholarly events but also the scientific contributions within publications (Fathalla et al. 2017b , 2018 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Core ontologies provide a precise definition of structural knowledge in a specific field that connects different application domains [3,4,5,11]. They are located in the layer between upper-level (fundamental) and domain-specific ontologies, providing the definition of the core concepts from a specific field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They aim at linking general concepts of a top-level ontology to more domain-specific concepts from a sub-field. Even though there is a large body of work making use of ontologies as a formal basis to model different aspects of scientific research, such as [3,4,5], few studies have focused on modeling scientific hypotheses [2,6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%