Horticultural Reviews 1981
DOI: 10.1002/9781118060766.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Senescence and Postharvest Physiology of Cut Flowers—Part 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
135
0
13

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 268 publications
12
135
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the results of the present study confirmed that longer vase life did The decline of fresh weight is due to transpiration exceeding water uptake (Harlevy and Mayak, 1981). One of the factors that influences the water deficit is the rate of water uptake and transport as well the ability of different organs on the cut flower shoot to compete for water which may be in limited supply (Halevy and Mayak, 1981). Ethylene treatment apparently changed the pattern of relative fresh weight loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the results of the present study confirmed that longer vase life did The decline of fresh weight is due to transpiration exceeding water uptake (Harlevy and Mayak, 1981). One of the factors that influences the water deficit is the rate of water uptake and transport as well the ability of different organs on the cut flower shoot to compete for water which may be in limited supply (Halevy and Mayak, 1981). Ethylene treatment apparently changed the pattern of relative fresh weight loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of germicides have been suggested by several research workers (Aarts, 1957;Marousky, 1969 and1971;Halevy and Mayak, 1981) to prevent this problem. Many studies have correlated an increase in the bacterial count in vase water with decreased longevity (Larsen and Frolich, 1969;van Doorn and Perik, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longevity was consistently improved in cut roses with the addition of germicides (Marousky, 1969;van Doorn and Perik, 1990) in vase water. Optimal postharvest life of cut flowers is often improved by using suitable vase solutions (Halevy andMayak, 1979 and1981). An effective flower food i.e., a preservative solution should contain three basic components to extend the life of cut flowers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cut rose (Rosa × hybrida) flower stems, the leaves play an important role in maintaining rates of water uptake through their transpiration (Halevy & Mayak 1981), and removal of these leaves reduces water uptake rates and causes flowers to not fully open. Adverse water relations are associated with incomplete flower opening, premature petal wilting and bending of the pedicel in rose (Doi et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%