Senior managers' perceptions of the HRM function during times of strategic organizational change

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by the human resource management (HRM) function in strategic organizational change initiatives. The objectives of the paper are to assess the extent to which the HRM function is perceived by senior managers to have contributed to the strategic organizational change agenda during a period of rapid change, and identify major challenges HRM professionals face as facilitators of strategic change management initiatives in contexts of this nature. Design/methodology/approach-The research objectives were addressed using literature-based evidence and primary interview data obtained from qualitative in-depth interviews with the directors and deputy directors of a public sector banking institution in Malaysia. Findings-In addition to identifying positive perceptions of the HRM function, the findings raise issues about the strategic focus, independence, credibility, and leadership strategies associated with the HR function's attempts to engage with strategic change initiatives. The findings also reveal the respondents' views about the extent to which HRM activities have or should have ethical, spiritual, and religious foci. Practical implications-The implications of the research findings for HRM are discussed with reference to issues such as: the transfer of Western-originating change management approaches to non-Western settings; the need for organizational change outcomes (including wider societal objectives) to be delineated clearly with reference to organizational change initiatives; and the close association between ethics, spirituality, and HRM in certain Asian contexts. Originality/value-The paper offers a valuable insight into the role of the HRM function in organizational change interventions with specific reference to the context of Malaysia.

The Organizational Change Process: Its Influence on Competences Learned on the Job

“…This result bears important implications for people management in organizations, because it challenges to what extent people management is ready to take an important role in the processes of organizational change as advocated by several authors in this field (Legge, 2006;Mascarenhas, 2009;Mascarenhas & Kirchbaum, 2008). This result corroborates managers' perceptions that people management practices occur dissociated from change processes (Guest & Conway, 2011;Rees & Johari, 2010).…”

Organisational Change and Workplace Stress in Teaching and Learning Settings: Case Study Evidence from a Public Sector University in the UK

“…Here, we note the contention of Rees (2008) in which he argues that there is not even a universally accepted definition of change. Similarly, Dunphy and Stace (1993) note, that there is such a diversity of approaches to change management that it is difficult to suggest a best method approach for change management practice even putting aside situations where change processes are adopted by the management team to promote or protect the status of their own position or department (Edgley-Pyshorn and Huisman 2011; Rees and Johari 2010).…”

Examine The Factor That Influence Training Reaction, And Its Consequence On Employee

“…However, the existing findings have been generated based on employees' perspective from Western context. According to Rees and Johari (2010), the findings that have been developed in the Western context, are not necessarily applicable to Asian countries. One explanation for this is the cultural differences between Western and Asian countries (Hofstede & Hodstede, 2005).…”