Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3373625.3416990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sense and Accessibility

Abstract: Sensing technologies that implicitly and explicitly mediate digital experiences are an increasingly pervasive part of daily living; it is vital to ensure that these technologies work appropriately for people with physical disabilities. We conducted on online survey with 40 adults with physical disabilities, gathering open-ended descriptions about respondents' experiences with a variety of sensing systems, including motion sensors, biometric sensors, speech input, as well as touch and gesture systems. We presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical interfaces and apps provided with these technologies may be partly or wholly accessible to people with disabilities. In addition, they may encode hidden assumptions, such as not allowing for certain heights above a certain age, excluding people with dwarfism [46]. They demarcate "what it means to be a legible human and whose bodies, actions, and lives fall outside.…”
Section: Plos Digital Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physical interfaces and apps provided with these technologies may be partly or wholly accessible to people with disabilities. In addition, they may encode hidden assumptions, such as not allowing for certain heights above a certain age, excluding people with dwarfism [46]. They demarcate "what it means to be a legible human and whose bodies, actions, and lives fall outside.…”
Section: Plos Digital Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home monitoring apps and devices such as Fitbit, Strava, and Continuous Glucose Monitors are another important example of inaccessible telehealth technologies. For example, Fitbits may not count exercise in a wheelchair as fitness time [46], encoding activity assumptions about what behaviors count. Furthermore, when digital health technologies are introduced, they often fail to reach the audience who would benefit from them the most due to limited awareness, resource or infrastructure constraints to support the technologies, and perceived benefits to adopt and continue use.…”
Section: Plos Digital Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%