2020
DOI: 10.11647/obp.0212.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sense-Making of COP 21 among Rural and City Residents

Abstract: Editing this book would not have been possible without the continuous support from a number of people whom we thank very much. Obviously, the volume would be nothing without the chapter authors' willingness to condense bigger research projects into book chapters and going through several rounds of revisions. We also acknowledge the great support of our student assistant, Joana Kollert, in putting this book together. Thank you to the anonymous reviewers of the individual chapters and overall book concept, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 286 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendation for sample size is to use a small number of participants (e.g., around 6-8 people), as this setting allows closer social interactions and a more trustworthy atmosphere. Based on our theoretical perspectives, we developed a structured discussion guide [66,67], and thus provided a framework for organizing the discussion around the central research interest in research questions (1) and (2). As an icebreaker, the initial discussion began with graphical 'climate animals' [68], such as the "angry gorilla" or the "busy bee".…”
Section: Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommendation for sample size is to use a small number of participants (e.g., around 6-8 people), as this setting allows closer social interactions and a more trustworthy atmosphere. Based on our theoretical perspectives, we developed a structured discussion guide [66,67], and thus provided a framework for organizing the discussion around the central research interest in research questions (1) and (2). As an icebreaker, the initial discussion began with graphical 'climate animals' [68], such as the "angry gorilla" or the "busy bee".…”
Section: Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%