2017
DOI: 10.3390/mti1030016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sense-making Strategies for the Interpretation of Visualizations—Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research

Abstract: Making sense of visualizations is often an open and explorative process. This process is still not very well understood. On the one hand, it is an open question which theoretical models are appropriate for the explanation of these activities. Heuristics and theories of everyday thinking probably describe this process better than more formal models. On the other hand, there are only few detailed investigations of interaction processes with information visualizations. We will try to relate approaches describing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reason students struggle with the job inside the realm of language is the absence of a second representation register for the prompt and a common name for the theorem. The geometric symbol enables simultaneous processing of symbols and words, which is required for comprehending geometric concepts and mathematical sense-making (Pohl and Doppler Haider, 2017). The geometrical version of the theorem can assist in comprehending the operation required for the issue-posing assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason students struggle with the job inside the realm of language is the absence of a second representation register for the prompt and a common name for the theorem. The geometric symbol enables simultaneous processing of symbols and words, which is required for comprehending geometric concepts and mathematical sense-making (Pohl and Doppler Haider, 2017). The geometrical version of the theorem can assist in comprehending the operation required for the issue-posing assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heer et al [22] described how users interact with a visual analytics tool by evaluating aggregated collections of history sessions. Pohl et al [32] qualitatively analyzed interaction provenance based on thinkingaloud protocols. They identified various strategies that users applied to interpret and understand visualizations: comparing, laddering, explaining (storytelling), summarizing, eliminating, and verifying.…”
Section: Provenance Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heer et al [21] described how users interact with a visual analytics tool by evaluating aggregated collections of history sessions. Pohl et al [31] qualitatively analyzed interaction provenance based on thinking-aloud protocols. They identified various strategies that users applied to interpret and understand visualizations: comparing, laddering, explaining (storytelling), summarizing, eliminating, and verifying.…”
Section: Provenance Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%