“…For example, although Zn-MOF-2, MOF-1, [Eu 2 (phen) 2 (2-nca) 6 ]·2H 2 O, {[Co(DCB)]·2H 2 O} n , {[Zn 3 (bpanth)(oba) 3 ]·2DMF} n , and CSMCRI-5 (Sl. No 3, 5, 7, 8, 14, 15 in Table S6, Supporting Information) possessed comparable or higher K sv values for both the Cr(VI) ions than IITKGP-70 , the higher LOD values reduce their overall potentiality. ,,− On the other hand, [Zn(OBA) 2 (L 1 )·2DMA] n , Zn-MOF, [Cu 2 (bpp) 2 Cl]·Hapta·H 2 O, and [Cd(dbta)] n (Sl. No 10, 12, 13, 16 in Table S6, Supporting Information) displayed lower K sv values with higher LOD values for both Cr 2 O 7 2– and CrO 4 2– anions than the developed framework IITKGP-70 , which uphold the overall potentiality of the developed framework. ,− Although Zn-MOF-1, {[Tb(tcmb)(H 2 O) 2 ]·2H 2 O} n , and [Zn(ATA)(L)]·H 2 O (Sl.…”