2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive detection of Foxp3 expression in bovine lymphocytes by flow cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we chose the mouse as a model, and compared two clones of anti-mouse Foxp3 antibodies and two Foxp3 staining buffer sets, which were the most frequently used in published studies in various species (Tsang et al, 2006;Izcue et al, 2008;Bolzer et al, 2009;Prochazkova et al, 2009;Gerner et al, 2010;Janikashvili et al, 2011;Lei et al, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2011;Robbin et al, 2011;Rocchi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we chose the mouse as a model, and compared two clones of anti-mouse Foxp3 antibodies and two Foxp3 staining buffer sets, which were the most frequently used in published studies in various species (Tsang et al, 2006;Izcue et al, 2008;Bolzer et al, 2009;Prochazkova et al, 2009;Gerner et al, 2010;Janikashvili et al, 2011;Lei et al, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2011;Robbin et al, 2011;Rocchi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we chose C57BL/6 mice as a model, and compared two kinds of Foxp3 clones: MF23 from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA) and FJK-16s. MF23 recognizes an epitope between the 1 and 87 amino acids in the N-terminal domain of the mouse Foxp3 protein, whereas FJK-16s maps the epitope to amino acids 75 and 125 of the mouse, rat, bovine (Gerner et al, 2010), porcine (Bolzer et al, 2009), canine (Pinheiro et al, 2011), ovine (Rocchi et al, 2011, and equine (Robbin et al, 2011) Foxp3 protein. Simultaneously, the Foxp3 buffer sets from the two vendors above were used in our system.…”
Section: Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-color analysis of FoxP3-expressing CD4 T cells was performed by staining cells according to a modification of a previously described protocol (40). Briefly, PBMC or splenocytes were thawed, washed, and incubated with 15 mg/ml MAb CACT138A and CACT108A for 15 min.…”
Section: Expression and Purification Of Recombinant Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these cells were bona fide Tregs or activated Tcons, which in some assay systems are capable of mediating non-specific suppression [354,355], remains unclear. A number of subsequent studies presented indirect evidence for populations of CD4 + , CD8 + and γδ T cells with regulatory activity [355][356][357][358][359][360][361], but T cells expressing FOXP3 were first documented in 2009: thus, Seo and colleagues developed novel mAbs against bovine FOXP3, demonstrating that its expression was limited to CD4 + CD25 + T cells [362], while Gerner and colleagues documented cross-reactivity of the antimouse/rat Foxp3 mAb FJK-16s, showing that the majority of FOXP3 + T cells were CD4 + but that minor populations of CD8β + and γδ + FOXP3 + lymphocytes could also be identified [363]. However, the regulatory properties of the CD4 + CD25 high FOXP3 + population were called into question by work performed by Hoek and colleagues, who suggested that these cells were neither anergic nor suppressive; rather, WC1.1 + and WC1.2 + γδ T cells, and CD14 + monocytes, showed regulatory properties in their experiments, supported by the observation that these cells transcribed IL-10 [364].…”
Section: Regulatory T Cells In Other Domestic Animal Species -An Expamentioning
confidence: 99%