2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44792-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive detection of low-abundance in-frame deletions in EGFR exon 19 using novel wild-type blockers in real-time PCR

Abstract: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are associated with response of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the existing methods for detection of samples having rare mutations(i.e. ~0.01%) have limits in terms of specificity, time consumption or cost. In the current study, novel wild-type blocking (WTB) oligonucleotides modified with phosphorothioate or inverted dT at the 5′-termini were designed to precisely detect 11 common delet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, several methods including Sanger DNA sequencing, next generation sequencing (NGS), and real-time PCR with TaqMan probe have been considered as a standard method for monitoring EGFR mutations [ 8 , 9 ]. Alternatively, there are various PCR-based modifications using DNA-LNA blocker [ 10 ], universal oligo-quencher [ 11 ], allele-specific probe [ 12 ], and graphene oxide [ 13 ]. Despite several PCR-based modifications have been developed in an attempt to detect ctDNA, they still have limitations such as low sensitivity for detecting low frequency of mutant ctDNA in the plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several methods including Sanger DNA sequencing, next generation sequencing (NGS), and real-time PCR with TaqMan probe have been considered as a standard method for monitoring EGFR mutations [ 8 , 9 ]. Alternatively, there are various PCR-based modifications using DNA-LNA blocker [ 10 ], universal oligo-quencher [ 11 ], allele-specific probe [ 12 ], and graphene oxide [ 13 ]. Despite several PCR-based modifications have been developed in an attempt to detect ctDNA, they still have limitations such as low sensitivity for detecting low frequency of mutant ctDNA in the plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%