2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive determination of auxins in environmental water and peach beverage by hyper crosslinked polymer-based solid-phase extraction with high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison also indicates that the proposed method presents the best sensitivity among the listed approaches except for SPE-HPLC/MS-MS method [31]. The recoveries obtained in the current method are better than that got in SPE-HPLC/MS-MS approach [31], and at the same level as that obtained in existing methods [11,29,30,[32][33][34][35][36][37]. The above comparison well implies that the established approach presents a good overall performance in the analysis of trace auxins.…”
Section: Comparison With Reported Approachessupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison also indicates that the proposed method presents the best sensitivity among the listed approaches except for SPE-HPLC/MS-MS method [31]. The recoveries obtained in the current method are better than that got in SPE-HPLC/MS-MS approach [31], and at the same level as that obtained in existing methods [11,29,30,[32][33][34][35][36][37]. The above comparison well implies that the established approach presents a good overall performance in the analysis of trace auxins.…”
Section: Comparison With Reported Approachessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As illustrated in Table 3, the extraction time spent in the current method is less than that needed in most of the previous studies [11, 3032, 34, 35]. The established method consumes less solvent than that required in SPE‐HPLC/UV [30, 35, 36], SPE‐HPLC with MS‐MS [31], MSPE‐HPLC/UV [32], and liquid‐liquid‐liquid microextraction‐HPLC/MS [34]. The comparison also indicates that the proposed method presents the best sensitivity among the listed approaches except for SPE‐HPLC/MS‐MS method [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations