2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive fluorescent sensor for the fuzzy exosomes in serum based on the exosome imprinted polymer sandwiched with aggregation induced emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the methods for EV determination reported previously, the GIP sensor has the lowest LOD (Table S1). In addition, compared with the molecularly imprinted polymer-based EV sensor, the GIP sensor has the advantages of easy realization of template molecular elution and EV recognition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the methods for EV determination reported previously, the GIP sensor has the lowest LOD (Table S1). In addition, compared with the molecularly imprinted polymer-based EV sensor, the GIP sensor has the advantages of easy realization of template molecular elution and EV recognition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecularly imprinted films, such as custom polymeric films with complementary binding sites to the template molecule, have a strong affinity and selectivity for the template molecule compared to the natural receptor. Recently, analytical methods have been developed for detecting EVs using a whole imprinted method using EVs directly as templates. However, EVs, as vesicles with a particle size of 30–150 nm, do not have a rigid structure and are easily deformed, making it difficult to form regular cavities in the molecularly imprinted polymer during its preparation, thus affecting the selective readsorption of EVs in the sample. In addition, it is also difficult to perform operations, such as elution and readsorption, due to its large size and fragility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo imaging of cancer biomarkers is another possible alternative to tissue biopsy [ 93 ]. Either way, MIP-based sensors and imaging probes have demonstrated great results for the detection of cancer biomarkers, such as nucleic acids, proteins, exosomes, and cancer cells [ 94 96 ]. As each biomarker comes with its own detection challenges, MIP-based technologies, as well as offering great stability and sensitivity, present an unprecedented adaptability of the detection probes [ 96 98 ].…”
Section: Mip-based Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GO quenched the fluorescence of the aptamer-bound FAM; however, in the presence of the target, the oligonucleotide would be released from the GO and the fluorescence would increase proportionally to the availability of the analyte. Liao et al developed the ‘turn-on’ fluorescent sensor to detect the presence of exosomes in patient serum with a sensitivity comparable to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ 94 ]. The detection process was achieved through aptamer-mediated aggregation-induced emission.…”
Section: Mip-based Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, exosomes are easy to identify, attracting attention as optimal biomarkers in liquid cancer biopsies. Recently, efforts have been made to detect exosomes based on various detection platforms, such as on electricity- [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], electrochemical- [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ], and optical-based platforms [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%