1996
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.25668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive plant species survey, Ashland District, Custer National Forest, Powder River and Rosebud Counties, Montana / by Bonnie L. Heidel and Hollis Marriott ; for Custer National Forest.

Abstract: Kansas. Susan Rinehart and Mike Munoz provided comments on draft copies of this report. This work was contracted by Custer National Forest with Montana Natural Heritage Program. State species of previously undetermined status 1 . Agastache foeniculum 59 2. Elatine americana 65 3. Evax prolifera 70 4. Geum canadense 77 5. Ipomopsis congesta var. pseudotypica 82 VI. DISCUSSION 90 VII. LITERATURE CITED 92 APPENDICES Appendix A -Preliminary list of sun'ey target species potentially occurring in Powder River and Ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite substrate differences, this stand on shale closely resembles in overall physiognomy and floristics those on the Custer National Forest which are on sandstone. It is also quite similar to stands sampled in northeastern and central Montana (Culwell et al 1986, Heidel 1996.…”
Section: Ecological Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite substrate differences, this stand on shale closely resembles in overall physiognomy and floristics those on the Custer National Forest which are on sandstone. It is also quite similar to stands sampled in northeastern and central Montana (Culwell et al 1986, Heidel 1996.…”
Section: Ecological Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Prior to fieldwork in 1996 and 1997, the Biological Conservation Database was queried for the most current information on occurrences of plant species of special concern (Heidel 1996(Heidel , 1997 known from Carter County. The resulting lists of species became the primary study targets, with particular emphasis on Sensitive or Watch species as recognized by the BLM (USDI BLM 1996).…”
Section: Botanical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations