2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis and energy conservation measures implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 9 shows a summary of the previous studies on the passive design techniques [138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148], and Table 10 shows a summary of the previous studies on the active design techniques [149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160]. Finally, Table 11 shows a summary of the previous studies on the combination of the passive and active design techniques [161][162][163][164][165][166][167].…”
Section: Energy-saving Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 9 shows a summary of the previous studies on the passive design techniques [138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148], and Table 10 shows a summary of the previous studies on the active design techniques [149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160]. Finally, Table 11 shows a summary of the previous studies on the combination of the passive and active design techniques [161][162][163][164][165][166][167].…”
Section: Energy-saving Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Its simulation engine is derived from DOE-2 simulation program which has been fully validated (DOE-2E 1981) and is an ASHRAE qualified (Diamond and Hunn 1981) computer program that predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building when information such as the hourly weather information, building model descriptions and its heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment and utility rate structure are provided. DOE-2 has undergone rigorous validations with test data from actual building operations (Lam et al 2008).…”
Section: Simulation Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous relevant studies defined sensitivity analysis as consisting of a quantitative comparison of the changes in the outputs to the changes in the inputs [80][81][82][83]. In this study, the regional and system factors of the GSHP system were fixed, and the design factors (e.g., borehole length, grout thermal conductivity, borehole spacing, borehole diameter, U-pipe diameter and U-pipe position) of the base case were configured as inputs (e.g., scenarios by category) according to the range to establish the GSHP system's scenarios (refer to Table 5).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity analysis on the environmental impact and energy generation of the GSHP system was performed by changing only one design factor. The sensitivity influence coefficient (IC) has been used in several studies as one of the most adequate forms of sensitivity coefficients in the assessment of sensitivity (refer to Equation (2)) [80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%