1988
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.22.4.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis for Equilibrium Network Flow

Abstract: Direct application of existing sensitivity analysis methods for nonlinear programming problems or for variational inequalities to nonlinear programming or variational inequality formulations of the equilibrium traffic assignment problem is not feasible, since, in general, the solution to the equilibrium traffic assignment problem does not satisfy the uniqueness conditions required by the sensitivity analysis methods. This paper presents an approach for sensitivity analysis of equilibrium traffic assignment pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
141
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
141
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the solution of a bilevel programming model is also referred to as a Stackelberg equilibrium solution. To address the problem in which partial derivatives cannot be obtained directly from the implicit functional relationship between the decision variables of the upper and lower levels, Tobin [2] and Tobin and Friesz [3] proposed sensitivity analysis methods to derive the descent direction of the objective function in the upper level and obtain the local optimum solution of the model. We also adopted this approach to solve the model in this study.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Generalized Inverse Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the solution of a bilevel programming model is also referred to as a Stackelberg equilibrium solution. To address the problem in which partial derivatives cannot be obtained directly from the implicit functional relationship between the decision variables of the upper and lower levels, Tobin [2] and Tobin and Friesz [3] proposed sensitivity analysis methods to derive the descent direction of the objective function in the upper level and obtain the local optimum solution of the model. We also adopted this approach to solve the model in this study.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Generalized Inverse Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take the trip chain behavior of road users into account, we integrated the variational inequality sensitivity analysis approaches proposed by Tobin [2] and Tobin and Friesz [3] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approximation can be made using the sensitivity analysis suggested by Tobin and Friesz (1988), which gives the following analytical expression for the Jacobian:…”
Section: Alternative Approximations Of the Jacobianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information from the lower level problem is transferred by so called influence factors, which can be defined by path proportions or explicit derivatives. The derivatives are computed based on the sensitivity analysis by Tobin and Friesz (1988). Assuming complementary conditions to hold and disregarding any topological dependencies, they get approximate values of the derivatives, which are acceptable for small to medium sized networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1980) mentioned above, though the algorithm is developed for solving the more general problem. The second algorithm involves calculating the gradient using a sensitivity analysis method (Tobin and Friesz, 1988) to obtain the partial derivatives of UE link flows with respect to O-D flows. It has been shown ) that, at least in a two-link network, the first algorithm converges to the mutually consistent solution while the second algorithm to the bi-level solution.…”
Section: Previous Solution Algorithms For the Combined Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%