2011
DOI: 10.3102/1076998610375836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis of Mixed Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data

Abstract: Mixed models are used for the analysis of data measured over time to study population-level change and individual differences in change characteristics. Linear and nonlinear functions may be used to describe a longitudinal response, individuals need not be observed at the same time points, and missing data, assumed to be missing at random (MAR), may be handled. While the mechanism giving rise to the missing data cannot be determined by the observations, the sensitivity of parameter estimates to missing data as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies for dealing with data that are NMAR may rely on known analytic procedures, including mean and covariance structure analysis, but may also include a model for the missingness. Major frameworks in this area include selection models and pattern-mixture models (Demirtas & Schafer, 2003; Kenward, 1998; Little, 1995; Xu & Blozis, 2010). A major complication in the estimation of NMAR models concerns the identification of parameters that correspondence to the dependence of the missingness on the missing data (Little & Rubin, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies for dealing with data that are NMAR may rely on known analytic procedures, including mean and covariance structure analysis, but may also include a model for the missingness. Major frameworks in this area include selection models and pattern-mixture models (Demirtas & Schafer, 2003; Kenward, 1998; Little, 1995; Xu & Blozis, 2010). A major complication in the estimation of NMAR models concerns the identification of parameters that correspondence to the dependence of the missingness on the missing data (Little & Rubin, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LMM, a likelihood-based method, is valid under the missing at random (MAR) assumption that missingness is unrelated to any unobserved variable. Although verifying the MAR assumption with observed data may not be possible, this assumption is commonly used in the literature (Xu & Blozis, 2011). Statistical Analysis Software was used to perform the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use various structures that are available within our multi-response model to perform a sensitivity analysis (Xu and Blozis, 2011) on the teacher rankings produced when analyzing a data set containing semester calculus grades from a large public university. We find that the rankings of teacher effects may change depending on the assumptions made about the structure of the missing data mechanism.…”
Section: Department Of Education 2009) Given the Magnitude Of The Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any of the MNAR models were to produce substantially different results from the standard GP model, this would indicate that the conclusions of the VAM depend on assumptions made about the nature of the missing observations. However, the appropriate missing data process cannot be chosen by empirical investigation of the observed data (including examination of the log-likelihood) since the observed data do not provide information to support one particular MNAR model over another (Fitzmaurice et al, 2004;Xu and Blozis, 2011). As stated by Molenberghs and Kenward (2007), "ignoring MNAR models is no different an option than shifting to one particular MNAR model, it is just much more convenient."…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%