2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00202-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of the 3-PRS parallel kinematic spindle platform of a serial-parallel machine tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to quantitatively evaluate the level of kinematic accuracy under various configurations, three types of error sensitively indexes that reflect the mapping relationship between the input and output error from three different aspects are introduced [14][15]. If the input error is set as a unit sphere, the volume of the unit sphere is mapped into an ellipsoid via the error transformation matrix.…”
Section: Establishment Of the Error And Reliability Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to quantitatively evaluate the level of kinematic accuracy under various configurations, three types of error sensitively indexes that reflect the mapping relationship between the input and output error from three different aspects are introduced [14][15]. If the input error is set as a unit sphere, the volume of the unit sphere is mapped into an ellipsoid via the error transformation matrix.…”
Section: Establishment Of the Error And Reliability Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [4] utilized a kinematic affectability examination strategy to clarify the gross movements of a 3-UPU parallel system, and demonstrated that it is exceptionally touchy to certain moment clearances. Fan et al [5] broke down the affectability of the 3PRS parallel kinematic shaft stage of a serial-parallel machine instrument. Verner et al [6] introduced another technique for ideal alignment of PKM in light of the abuse of the minimum blunder touchy districts in their workspace and geometric parameters space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each leg has a slider attached to the base by an actuated prismatic joint (P), a coupler connected to the slider by a passive rotational joint (R) and to the platform by a passive spherical joint (S). The 3-PRS manipulator was first described in Carretero et al (2000b) for a telescope application, and then it was proposed as a machining centre in Fan et al (2003) and for a medical application in Merlet (2001). The kinematics and workspace analyses of the manipulator have been extensively studied in Carretero et al (2000a), Carretero et al (2000b), Tsai et al (2002), Li and Xu (2007), to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%