2010
DOI: 10.5194/bg-7-3685-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and predictive uncertainty of the ACASA model at a spruce forest site

Abstract: Abstract. The sensitivity and predictive uncertainty of the Advanced Canopy-Atmosphere-Soil Algorithm (ACASA) was assessed by employing the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method. ACASA is a standscale, multi-layer soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer model that incorporates a third order closure method to simulate the turbulent exchange of energy and matter within and above the canopy. Fluxes simulated by the model were compared to sensible and latent heat fluxes as well as the net ecosyst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we estimated the ground surface from measurements of the projected plant surface neglecting stem and understory contributions. The average PAI (Plant Area Index) of this forest stand is 5 m 2 m −2 (Staudt et al, 2010). This projected area can be converted to a surface area by multiplying with π for wooden parts (assuming they are round), which contribute about 20% (5-35% (Gower et al, 1999)) to the PAI and by a factor of 2.65 derived by Oren et al (1986) to convert the projected LAI (∼ 80% of PAI) to the geometric needle surface.…”
Section: S/v Ground Versus S/v Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we estimated the ground surface from measurements of the projected plant surface neglecting stem and understory contributions. The average PAI (Plant Area Index) of this forest stand is 5 m 2 m −2 (Staudt et al, 2010). This projected area can be converted to a surface area by multiplying with π for wooden parts (assuming they are round), which contribute about 20% (5-35% (Gower et al, 1999)) to the PAI and by a factor of 2.65 derived by Oren et al (1986) to convert the projected LAI (∼ 80% of PAI) to the geometric needle surface.…”
Section: S/v Ground Versus S/v Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few studies, the authors decided to use the raw flux data without closing the energy balance. This decision to use a third method was made because either the authors were interested in flux patterns rather than total fluxes (Carrer et al, 2012) or they had doubts about the correctness of the Bowen ratio method (Staudt et al, 2010). Recently, based on arguments raised by Foken (2008) and experimental findings of Mauder and Foken (2006), a fourth method was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was modified in three parts. The first change relates to the soil respiration calculations and was already examined by Staudt et al (2010) for spruce. The original soil moisture 30 attenuation factor was disabled because it not only reduced soil microbial respiration during dry periods, but also enhanced respiration rates to unreasonably high values during wet periods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second change according to Staudt et al (2010) was made to the calculation of photosynthesis. Originally, in the plant physiology sub-module, the temperature dependence of the maximum catalytic activity of Rubisco at saturated ribulose biphosphate (RuBP) and saturated CO 2 , V cmax (µmol m…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%