1973
DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(73)90023-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and responsivity measures for discrimination learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SI ¼ pðHRÞ À pðFAÞ 2 pðHRÞ þ pðFAÞ ½ ÀpðHRÞ þ pðFAÞ ½ 2 SI provides a nonparametric assessment of sensitivity (Frey and Colliver, 1973). Values for SI vary from − 1 to +1, with +1 indicating that all target events were responded to, whereas all nontarget events were inhibited from responding to, and 0 indicating chance levels of distinguishing between signal and nonsignal events.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SI ¼ pðHRÞ À pðFAÞ 2 pðHRÞ þ pðFAÞ ½ ÀpðHRÞ þ pðFAÞ ½ 2 SI provides a nonparametric assessment of sensitivity (Frey and Colliver, 1973). Values for SI vary from − 1 to +1, with +1 indicating that all target events were responded to, whereas all nontarget events were inhibited from responding to, and 0 indicating chance levels of distinguishing between signal and nonsignal events.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI was also the basis by which McGaughy and Sarter (1995) developed their vigilance index measure and hence would produce comparable results for mice to those seen in rats performing their vigilance paradigm. To mirror the use of SI, the nonparametric response bias measure RI (Frey and Colliver, 1973) was chosen to provide a measure of the 'tendency to respond' (Frey and Colliver, 1973;Marston, 1996;Sahgal, 1987).…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is comparable to the sensitivity index (SI) (Frey and Colliver, 1973) except that VI is based on the relative number of hits and false alarms, whereas SI is calculated using the probabilities for hits and false alarms. Thus, VI values are not confounded by errors of omission.…”
Section: Behavioral Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain an overall measure of performance that reflects the animals' accuracy in both signal and nonsignal trials, a 'vigilance index' was calculated (VI ¼ 9(hÀf)/2 Â (h + f)À(h + f) 2 )). VI is a modification of the sensitivity index (Frey and Colliver, 1973) and is based on the relative number of correct responses as opposed to the probability for such responses, thereby removing errors of omissions from this index. VI values range from À1 to 1, with a score of 1 indicating that all responses were hits and correct rejections, 0 indicating random lever selection, and À1 reflecting that all responses were misses and false alarms.…”
Section: Measures Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%