1988
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of clinical case definitions for pertussis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical case definitions of pertussis have limited specificity (162)(163)(164). Therefore, in the following, for assessment of the sensitivities of serodiagnosis methods, we used studies, as much as possible, in which clinical suspicion of pertussis was confirmed by positivity of culture and/or PCR for B. pertussis.…”
Section: Serodiagnosis Of Pertussismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical case definitions of pertussis have limited specificity (162)(163)(164). Therefore, in the following, for assessment of the sensitivities of serodiagnosis methods, we used studies, as much as possible, in which clinical suspicion of pertussis was confirmed by positivity of culture and/or PCR for B. pertussis.…”
Section: Serodiagnosis Of Pertussismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, diagnosis of pertussis infection usually depends on the presence of symptoms such as cough, paroxysms and Whooping inspiration (3). Patriarca et al (4) suggest 14 clinical case definitions with different sensitivity and specificity depending on the combination of symptoms used, Nevertheless, establishing a clinical diagnosis is becoming more difficult, because an increasing number of vaccinated and/or 1University Children's Hospital, University of Basel, ~Roemergasse 8 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). These cases cannot be detected by conventional laboratory methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for this finding include a substantially larger inter-individual scatter than the within error in the paired experiments with and without pertussis toxin. Incorrect assignment of children to the pertussis group might be another reason although because of the high sensitivity and specificity of the clinical case definition of pertussis [18], together with the occurrence during a local endemic outbreak with documented positive cultures, this appears unlikely. Finally, pertussis infection itself might have altered histamine release from basophils either by direct action on the basophils or mediated by other activated cell types in the suspension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third group consisted of 33 children with pertussis infection (4.5 _+ 0.34 years old; range 0.7-8.5). Diagnosis of pertussis [18] was established by typical clinical features like cough for more than 14 days or whoop (positive in 100%), history of contact 586 with a known case (positive in 85%), leucocytosis (> 12000/gl in 37%), absolute lymphocytosis, increased specific serum IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies (ELISA) (positive in 58%) and in several cases by culture of B.pertussis from a nasopharyngeal swab (positive in 73%). All cases occurred during a local pertussis endemic from April to August 1989.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%