2017
DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2016-0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening: is the oral glucose tolerance test still the standard?

Abstract: OGTT showed the weak capacity to diagnose DM in CF and should no longer be considered as the reference method for CFRD screening in patients with CF. In our study, HOMA-%B showed promising metrics for CFRD screening. Finally, CGMS revealed that pathological glucose excursions were frequent even early in life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer-term outcome studies are currently underway. (96) may be more sensitive than OGTT to detect risk for progression to CFRD; however, evidence linking these results to long-term outcomes is lacking, and these tests are not recommended for screening (97). CFRD mortality has significantly decreased over time, and the gap in mortality between cystic fibrosis patients with and without diabetes has considerably narrowed (98).…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer-term outcome studies are currently underway. (96) may be more sensitive than OGTT to detect risk for progression to CFRD; however, evidence linking these results to long-term outcomes is lacking, and these tests are not recommended for screening (97). CFRD mortality has significantly decreased over time, and the gap in mortality between cystic fibrosis patients with and without diabetes has considerably narrowed (98).…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Diabetes Association recommends testing CF patients from 10 years of age using the OGTT ( 97 ). The conventional OGTT, however, has been shown to have weak capacity to diagnose DM in CF individuals ( 98 ), as the inherent variability of the test and the variability observed in individual CF patients over time, means it does not accurately reflect glucose handling ( 99 ). The test itself is inconvenient and time consuming, thus adding to the patient’s already high burden of investigations, treatments, and hospital visits, causing low adherence to annual screenings ( 100 ).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Cfrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although OGTT is currently the recommended screening test for CFRD, it showed a great variability in CF patients with only 41% of the normal test confirmed in a subsequent test and a within‐subject coefficient of variation of 25% for 2‐h plasma glucose . Moreover, OGTT does not reflect glucose oscillation under real‐life conditions, and it seems to be less sensitive than continuous glucose monitoring . On the other hand, though LCI is a promising measure to monitoring early CF lung disease, its clinical utility remains to be defined …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%