2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of nested and real-time PCR for the detection of Pneumocystis jiroveci in clinical specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
52
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the findings of some studies, no patient with a negative qPCR result was observed among patients with PCP in the area of the Nice University Hospital between April 2008 and October 2013 (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). All patients with positive microscopy results were diagnosed with PCP and had C T values below the threshold for exclusion of a diagnosis of PCP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the findings of some studies, no patient with a negative qPCR result was observed among patients with PCP in the area of the Nice University Hospital between April 2008 and October 2013 (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). All patients with positive microscopy results were diagnosed with PCP and had C T values below the threshold for exclusion of a diagnosis of PCP.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The more elevated that the fungal burden is, the higher the probability that the diagnosis is pneumonia (37,38). Thus, the use of qPCR could greatly increase the specificity of detection with a good sensitivity even if it could not detect all cases of PCP (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Pneumocystis jirovecii cannot be cultured, and its detection is based on staining methods using respiratory specimens, which suffer from low sensitivity (214). Consequently, many studies have evaluated the performance of PCR on respiratory specimens for PCP diagnosis, and the results seem promising, with sensitivity values as high as 100% (91,(215)(216)(217)(218)(219)(220)(221)(222)(223)(224). However, in the case of PCP, colonization is a significant issue, with rates as high as 22% in high-risk populations (225), and more importantly, since DNA is fairly stable, it is difficult to distinguish between active and previous infections (226).…”
Section: Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the mean concentration of DNA from BAL fluid samples can be manifold higher in infected individuals than in asymptomatic carriers (219). Thus, many different real-time PCR assays have been developed and evaluated, with studies showing sensitivity values comparable to those of conventional PCR techniques and consistently higher than 80% (91,216,217,220,222,224). The real breakthrough, though, is found in the comparison of specificity values, with reports indicating a specificity of real-time PCR that can reach 98% and that is superior to those of conventional PCR techniques at cutoff points selected to not affect sensitivity (216).…”
Section: Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability is specially related to the skills of the team inducing the sputum [76]. Several PCR assays have been developed for the diagnosis of PCP, and have been tested on BAL, induced sputum and noninvasive oral wash specimens [77]. In general, PCR assays have been more sensitive but less specific for diagnosis of PCP than traditional microscopic methods.…”
Section: Bacterial Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%