2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0306-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of the animal fluency test for predicting postoperative delirium

Abstract: Background Preoperative cognitive impairment is a major risk factor for postoperative delirium. We therefore investigated the prognostic significance and feasibility of administering a brief cognitive screen before surgery. Methods Patients [ 65 yr of age undergoing hip, knee, or spine surgery were enrolled. A 60-sec cognitive screen, the animal fluency test (AFT), was administered preoperatively. Postoperative delirium was measured using a chart-based tool previously validated using criteria from the Confusio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Category fluency has also been used as a cognitive screening test in this setting with similar results in terms of prevalence of probable cognitive impairment preoperatively and association with delirium postoperatively but selection bias is possible since about half of eligible patients were not screened. 43 It is important to emphasize in this context that no single cognitive test, administered at a single time, can diagnose MCI or dementia. Therefore, by itself, a low preoperative MiniCog score is not enough to diagnose or label a patient as having a memory disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Category fluency has also been used as a cognitive screening test in this setting with similar results in terms of prevalence of probable cognitive impairment preoperatively and association with delirium postoperatively but selection bias is possible since about half of eligible patients were not screened. 43 It is important to emphasize in this context that no single cognitive test, administered at a single time, can diagnose MCI or dementia. Therefore, by itself, a low preoperative MiniCog score is not enough to diagnose or label a patient as having a memory disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, we cannot exclude the possibility that other brief instruments could work as well or better in the presurgical setting. (14,26,27,4447) As screening instruments, the Mini-Cog and CIB will inevitably yield false positives and negatives. Someone falsely labeled as impaired may elect to forgo elective surgery for fear of having cognitive impairment afterward but those who proceed will likely just receive increased vigilance (e.g., geriatric consultation, more careful monitoring during anesthesia, joint discharge instructions), and those with undetected impairment will be no worse off than our patients are currently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are myriad reasons for this, but one is the perception that such screening is unduly burdensome and time-consuming for a surgical setting. 8,[11][12][13] This has been addressed to some degree in the case of preoperative cognitive screening, with work by several groups, including us, demonstrating that brief instruments such as the Mini-Cog and Animal Verbal Fluency can identify patients at risk for poor surgical outcomes. 10,11,14,15 Similarly, there are numerous validated tools to assess frailty, but little consensus about which are best suited to the preoperative setting.…”
Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[11][12][13] This has been addressed to some degree in the case of preoperative cognitive screening, with work by several groups, including us, demonstrating that brief instruments such as the Mini-Cog and Animal Verbal Fluency can identify patients at risk for poor surgical outcomes. 10,11,14,15 Similarly, there are numerous validated tools to assess frailty, but little consensus about which are best suited to the preoperative setting. Thus far, investigations of the relationship between frailty and adverse surgical outcomes have largely relied on instruments such as the Frailty Index or the Frailty Phenotype which, are relatively time consuming and labor intensive and therefore unlikely to be widely accepted or adopted in a high throughput preoperative setting.…”
Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning
confidence: 99%