2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00249-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound indices of ovulation in spontaneous cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scanning was performed every other day until a follicle reached 16 mm and then daily until evidence of ovulation. Details concerning ultrasound investigations were previously published (20). The estimated day of ovulation as determined by ultrasound was defined as the day of maximum follicular enlargement, followed the next day by evidence of rupture.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning was performed every other day until a follicle reached 16 mm and then daily until evidence of ovulation. Details concerning ultrasound investigations were previously published (20). The estimated day of ovulation as determined by ultrasound was defined as the day of maximum follicular enlargement, followed the next day by evidence of rupture.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follicular diameter was determined by calculating the mean of the two perpendicular diameters measured at the largest plane of the follicle. Ovulation was suspected by documenting at least two of the following parameters: (1) a decrease in follicular diameter; (2) blurring of the follicular border; (3) the presence of internal echoes; and (4) free fluid in the cul-de-sac [29]. Ovulation was confirmed by P level 4 ng/ml.…”
Section: Transvaginal Sonographic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore use a detailed database of follicular measurements. The database was described in detail elsewhere (31,32). In brief, there were 533 ultrasound measurements of follicular size from 327 cycles in 107 women who were not taking hormonal medication and had no history that would suggest subfertility.…”
Section: Follicular Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%