2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2003.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of [11C]N-methylpyrrolidinyl benzilate ([11C]NMPYB) to endogenous acetylcholine: PET imaging vs tissue sampling methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies demonstrate that use of a consistent in vivo technique can provide reliable measures of specific binding of radioligands to high affinity sites in the rat brain [17]. Ma et al [18] compared the errors associated with dissection, which has been used for many years, and in vivo imaging studies using a dedicated small animal imager. Treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor was studied in both awake and isoflurane-anesthetized rats using both ex vivo dissection and in vivo imaging as the analytical tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies demonstrate that use of a consistent in vivo technique can provide reliable measures of specific binding of radioligands to high affinity sites in the rat brain [17]. Ma et al [18] compared the errors associated with dissection, which has been used for many years, and in vivo imaging studies using a dedicated small animal imager. Treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor was studied in both awake and isoflurane-anesthetized rats using both ex vivo dissection and in vivo imaging as the analytical tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo dissection showed a statistically significant 10% inhibition of a radiolabeled muscarinic receptor ligand binding in both awake and anesthetized animals, showing no effect of using isoflurane anesthesia. However, small animal imaging in anesthetized animals failed to successfully demonstrate inhibition of radiotracer binding, most likely due to the increased variation [18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11 C](+)3-MPB was not sensitive to increased endogenous ACh levels following administration of an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, but two related compounds, [ 11 C](+)3-EPB and [ 11 C](+)3-PPB, with lower mAChR affinity, were sensitive to elevations of endogenous ACh provoked by administration of donepezil (250 μg/kg), leading to significantly reduced binding (e.g., for [ 11 C](+)3-PPB ∼19 % in striatum and ∼52 % in frontal cortex) in monkey brain (Nishiyama et al 2001 ; Tsukada et al 2004 ) (Table 4 ). Another subtype non-selective mAChR radioligand, [ 11 C]NMPYB, was found not to be sensitive to ACh in PET studies on rats (Ma et al 2004 ).…”
Section: Current State Of the Art: Imaging Neurotransmitter Changes Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skaddan et al [48,100,101] and Ma et al [102] have also developed reversible ligands that monitor changes in acetylcholine resulting from inhibition of mAChE using phenserine. They evaluated a series of 31 compounds to chose the one with optimal properties to measure changes in endogenous acetylcholine.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Radioligand Binding To Competition With Endogmentioning
confidence: 99%