2009
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.8.659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Administrative Claims to Identify Incident Cases of Lung Cancer: A Comparison of 3 Health Plans

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Administrative claims are readily available, but their usefulness for identifying persons with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is relatively unknown, particularly for younger persons and those enrolled in Medicaid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Claims are surrogate measures for diagnoses and coding errors are possible. However, emerging validation data regarding lung cancer claims demonstrated a high degree of accuracy for detection of lung cancer diagnoses in cancer registry data and medical records (23, 24). We also employed the same claims-based algorithms that have been previously used to study cancer among kidney transplant recipients (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claims are surrogate measures for diagnoses and coding errors are possible. However, emerging validation data regarding lung cancer claims demonstrated a high degree of accuracy for detection of lung cancer diagnoses in cancer registry data and medical records (23, 24). We also employed the same claims-based algorithms that have been previously used to study cancer among kidney transplant recipients (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even physician report may be unreliable, as the treating rheumatologist may not have the primary information about an incident malignancy. Administrative databases based on claims data are also not ideal, as the methodology used to define malignancy can cause the positive predictive value to vary widely [21,22]. We attempted to validate physician report of incident malignancy based on physician questionnaires and adverse event forms using a gold standard of pertinent medical records review in a large cohort of patients with RA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 In the lung cancer population, the sensitivity of ICD-9 codes is 99.4% for patients with private insurance, 87.7% for Medicare patients, and 51.1% for Medicaid patients. 23 Undercoding for specific insurance groups may have systematically introduced bias into the data. Our results showed that complicated diverticulitis was present in 10.5% of Medicaid patients and 11.1% of private-insurance patients, but Medicaid patients had more emergency admissions (87.9%) than private-insurance patients did (75.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%