2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9339-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of an ecosystem model to hydrology and temperature

Abstract: We tested the sensitivity of a dynamic ecosystem model (LPJ-GUESS) to the representation of soil moisture and soil temperature and to uncertainties in the prediction of precipitation and air temperature. We linked the ecosystem model with an advanced hydrological model (JULES) and used its soil moisture and soil temperature as input into the ecosystem model. We analysed these sensitivities along a latitudinal gradient in northern Russia. Differences in soil temperature and soil moisture had only little influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models require absolute values and need the present day climate conditions as accurately as possible in order to examine the impact of climate change. For instance, a temperature bias results in a significant impact on vegetation carbon uptake (Wolf et al 2007). Therefore the meteorological data of near surface temperature and precipitation for the future climate were corrected with a method similar to the "delta change approach" (e.g.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The models require absolute values and need the present day climate conditions as accurately as possible in order to examine the impact of climate change. For instance, a temperature bias results in a significant impact on vegetation carbon uptake (Wolf et al 2007). Therefore the meteorological data of near surface temperature and precipitation for the future climate were corrected with a method similar to the "delta change approach" (e.g.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest distribution of Hagemann (2002) can be considered as quasi-observed dataset (satellite data product). The forest distribution of LPJ-GUESS is a state of equilibrium derived after a 1,000-year spin-up period, driven by the meteorological quantities from the CRU timeseries from 1901 to 1930 repeatedly to provide the climate input for the spin-up (Wolf et al 2007). LPJ-GUESS provides a "present-potential" vegetation, without human influence, e. g. deforestation and additional simulation biases.…”
Section: Forest Ratio 2 Non-forest Ratio (All Areas Occupied By Vegementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LSP is a key indicator of ecosystem dynamics that are susceptible to environmental change (Myneni et al, 1997). Detecting biotic responses such as phenology to a changing environment is essential for understanding the consequences of global change including impacts to ecosystem carbon balance (Merbold et al, 2009), (Wolf et al, 2008) energy balance (Euskirchen et al, 2007), (Chapin et al, 2005), and biodiversity (Foster et al 2010). This study aimed to monitor seasonal and interannual trends in LSP and understand how LSP responds to altered surface hydrology and interannual climatic and other environmental variability using reflectance data from the robotic tram system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPJ-GUESS vegetation model was also utilized to investigate possible changes in insect herbivory and its impact on vegetation growth and productivity as a result of increasing temperatures (Wolf et al 2008b). The results suggest that the predicted temperature variation in the Barents Sea Region may lead to a potential impact that will be strongest in the eastern (Russian) part of our study region.…”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change On Ecosystem Integritymentioning
confidence: 97%