2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of engineering demand parameters as a function of structural typology and assessment method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…loss of the capacity of a structural member) resulting from complex nonlinear deformation or energy dissipation, to a unique point in the monotonic skeleton curve. The most used indicators compute the ductility (Krawinkler et al, 2003;Farrow and Kurama, 2003), eigen-frequency drop-off (Stocchi and Richard, 2019) or plastic energy (Ke et al, 2017). For the sake of brevity, in this case the structural response is evaluated by quantifying a inelastic seismic demand index, namely the plastic energy dissipation (W P ).…”
Section: Damage Index and Structural Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…loss of the capacity of a structural member) resulting from complex nonlinear deformation or energy dissipation, to a unique point in the monotonic skeleton curve. The most used indicators compute the ductility (Krawinkler et al, 2003;Farrow and Kurama, 2003), eigen-frequency drop-off (Stocchi and Richard, 2019) or plastic energy (Ke et al, 2017). For the sake of brevity, in this case the structural response is evaluated by quantifying a inelastic seismic demand index, namely the plastic energy dissipation (W P ).…”
Section: Damage Index and Structural Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To combine the ground motion records from Cloud analysis with model uncertainty, they used the simplified method with a random combination. 2019) [4] investigated the sensitivity of EDP with respect to structural modeling and its typology. Two benchmark models were used: BANDIT (different frames modeling) and SMART2013 (different wall modeling).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Materials and Modeling Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach is included within the traditional framework of the performancebased earthquake and structural engineering [35,36]. EDPs are usually defined by guidelines [43] and past research studies [44,45]. For instance, structural elements such as reinforced concrete columns are sensitive to both element chord rotation and inter-storey drift ratio (relative displacement between the stories normalised over the storey height), and such parameters are typically used as EDPs for seismic assessment.…”
Section: Performance-based Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%